![how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force](http://mas.txt-nifty.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2009/09/13/2009091309.jpg)
Promoting the injection for 5-year-olds, First Lady Jill Biden visited Texas Children’s Hospital straight away, applauding the hospital for the 39,000 pediatric vaccine appointments it had already scheduled.Īlso worthy of shunning are the 20,000 individual vaccine providers who were pre-positioned to “hit the ground running” and “ get shots in little arms.” Pediatric hospitals, meanwhile, are playing a frontline role as COVID vaccination sites. Without exception, all the universities at which ACIP members have appointments - Brown, Drexel, Harvard, Michigan State, Ohio State, Stanford, University of Maryland, University of Washington, Vanderbilt and Wake Forest - have mandated COVID vaccines. The latter include the nation’s top universities and leading pediatric hospitals. With their vote to give young children the dangerous injections, ACIP members signaled that they, too, deserve to be shunned, along with the powerful institutions with which they are affiliated. It was banal bureaucrats announcing plans for a Blitzkrieg and the bought white coats were cheering them on.” Political scientist Toby Rogers agreed, stating the ACIP meeting “was not a scientific review. Though billed as “ independent,” the 14 ACIP members - like the 17 members of FDA’s VRBPAC who voted the same way the previous week - have deep ties to pharma, with careers that hinge on promoting and rubber-stamping the United States’ destructive one-size-fits-all vaccination agenda.ĭescribing the VRBPAC and ACIP meetings as “a total sham,” Children’s Health Defense President Mary Holland said, “Sadly, approval from these committees means nothing in terms of safety.”
![how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force](http://mas.txt-nifty.com/.shared/image.html?/photos/uncategorized/2009/09/13/2009091311.jpg)
Neither the disgracefully unscientific vote nor CDC Director Rochelle Walensky’s prompt endorsement came as a surprise. 2, the members of ACIP voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old.Ĭommittee members readily voted “yes” despite many unknowns about long-term safety, including a complete lack of data on the risk of heart problems like the ones experienced by some adolescents who received COVID vaccines. Were their decisions driven by science and conscience - or their ties to drugmakers? 2, members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee voted 14–0 to recommend Pfizer’s pediatric COVID shot for children 5 –11 years old. Visit and follow us on Instagram at crg_globalresearch. To receive Global Research’s Daily Newsletter (selected articles), click here. Global Research / Children’s Health DefenseĪll Global Research articles can be read in 51 languages by activating the “Translate Website” drop down menu on the top banner of our home page (Desktop version).
![how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force how did bradley manning threaten the state’s monopoly over the use of force](https://publications.armywarcollege.edu/Thumbnails/3752_page_1.png)
14 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children - And Their Big Ties to Big Pharmaġ4 ACIP Members Who Voted to Jab Your Young Children - And Their Big Ties to Big Pharma